Roadscape public packet

Fremont Blvd @ Mowry Ave: what a screening packet separates

This is a short public sample from Roadscape's corridor-analysis workflow. It is not the full private report and it is not engineer-stamped. Its job is to show the evidence structure: cited facts, screening assumptions, and what still needs field measurement.

Open RoadscapeBack to Fremont study
Screening / planning only

The usable point

Roadscape puts the city's own 49.4% southbound AM-peak delay-reduction claim in the right category: cited city evidence. It then separates that from what is still missing: actual ADT, turning counts, queue observations, bike/ped counts, emergency-route status, and before/after corridor safety proof.

Estimated lane count, posted speed, operating speed, ADT, curb-to-curb width, and truck/bus share stay labeled as assumptions until field measurement or agency data confirms them.

That separation matters. A public argument gets stronger when it does not pretend an estimate is a measured fact.

49.4%city delay claim, cited
0field-count days in this sample
PErequired before official use
Provenance split

How this packet labels claims

Real / cited

Location, protected-intersection history, right-turn lane removal/restoration, the city's stated delay reason, crash-history context, bikeway project context, and growth signals when tied to public records.

Estimated

Representative lane count, posted speed, operating speed, ADT, curb-to-curb width, and truck/bus share until measured or confirmed by agency data.

Needs field measurement

Turning movements, pedestrian and bike counts, blocked-turn events, queue observations, emergency-route status, and current before/after safety performance.

Roadscape can screen and organize evidence. Official redesign, pavement, or safety decisions require local standards, agency records, and licensed Professional Engineer review.

Short excerpt

Snippet used in the Fremont study

Roadscape screening note: Fremont's documented Mowry fix is real city evidence of a delay problem, but the corridor still needs measured ADT, turn counts, bike/ped counts, queue observations, and before/after crash proof before any official conclusion.