NU · neighbordoorsrecords over spin
Open in NU's Reading Room →

Tenant Protections

Understanding the current state of tenant rights, eviction, and rent affordability in the United States

Tenant protections are a critical aspect of housing policy in the United States. With rising concerns about eviction, rent affordability, and tenant rights, it is essential to examine the current state of these protections. This article aims to provide an in-depth analysis of tenant protections, drawing on existing research and court cases.

The Current State of Tenant Rights

The current state of tenant rights in the United States is complex and varied. According to Coulson, Le, and Ortego-Marti [1], tenant rights, eviction, and rent affordability are closely intertwined. Their research highlights the need for a comprehensive understanding of these issues. In another study, Coulson, Le, and Shen [2] found that tenant rights have a significant impact on eviction rates and rent affordability.

Eviction and Rent Affordability

Eviction and rent affordability are two critical issues affecting tenants. Rafkin [5] conducted a study on tenant preferences and beliefs about eviction, finding that tenants have varying perceptions about eviction and its consequences. The study highlights the need for targeted interventions to address these concerns. Another study by Rafkin [7] and [8] corroborates these findings, emphasizing the importance of understanding tenant preferences and beliefs.

Court Cases and Tenant Protections

Several court cases have shaped the landscape of tenant protections. For instance, in Rhode Island Commission for Human Rights v. Graul [3], the court addressed issues related to tenant rights and eviction. This case highlights the importance of understanding the legal framework surrounding tenant protections. More recently, in Iowa Civil Rights Commission v. McKillip [6], the court of appeals in Iowa considered a case related to tenant rights and discrimination.

Tenant Protections in Different States

Tenant protections vary across states. For example, in Vermont, the superior court heard a case related to tenant protections and discrimination in Human Rights v. Bissonette Properties [9]. This case demonstrates the diversity of tenant protection laws across different states.

Key Findings and Implications

The existing research and court cases highlight several key findings and implications for tenant protections. Firstly, tenant rights have a significant impact on eviction rates and rent affordability. Secondly, tenant preferences and beliefs about eviction are complex and varied. Finally, court cases have shaped the landscape of tenant protections, highlighting the need for a comprehensive understanding of the legal framework.

Concrete Checklist for Tenants

Based on the existing research and court cases, the following checklist can help tenants navigate the complex landscape of tenant protections:

How to Maintain Tenant Protections

To maintain tenant protections, it is essential to stay informed about changes to tenant protection laws and regulations. Tenants can also work with local advocacy groups to push for stronger protections. Landlords and policymakers must prioritize tenant rights and work to address issues related to eviction and rent affordability.

Conclusion

Tenant protections are a critical aspect of housing policy in the United States. By understanding the current state of tenant rights, eviction, and rent affordability, tenants, landlords, and policymakers can work together to create a more equitable housing market. This article provides a comprehensive overview of tenant protections, highlighting key findings and implications from existing research and court cases.

References

[1] Coulson, N. E., Le, T., & Ortego-Marti, V. (2025). Tenant rights, eviction, and rent affordability. Journal of Urban Economics.

[2] Coulson, N. E., Le, T., & Shen, L. (2020). Tenant Rights, Eviction, and Rent Affordability. SSRN Electronic Journal.

[3] Rhode Island Commission for Human Rights v. Graul, District Court, D. Rhode Island, filed 2015-08-13, docket C.A. No. 13-445-M-LDA.

[4] Property in the Margins.

[5] Rafkin, C. (2022). Tenant preferences and beliefs about eviction. AEA Randomized Controlled Trials.

[6] Iowa Civil Rights Commission v. McKillip, Court of Appeals of Iowa, filed 2025-02-05, docket 23-1747.

[7] Rafkin, C. (2022). Tenant preferences and beliefs about eviction. AEA Randomized Controlled Trials.

[8] Rafkin, C. (2022). Tenant preferences and beliefs about eviction. AEA Randomized Controlled Trials.

[9] Human Rights v. Bissonette Properties, Vermont Superior Court, filed 2024-11-20, docket 24-cv-1958.

This is not legal advice; consult counsel.

Sources (the record)

NU original — sourced analysis of the public record. Read it in the interactive Reading Room, or browse more at neighbordoors.com.

Transparency: NU articles are AI-assisted and editor-reviewed, built from the cited primary sources. We label what's proven, alleged, and opinion.